🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."