🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of states are considering comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". A law could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to approve a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and suitable for minors," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of Australia and others show that governments globally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.